Popular Articles

CRFB Applauds President Obama's Focus On Paying For Health Care Reform
Today, in an address to the American Medical Association, President Obama made the case for health care reform focused on bringing down long-term costs. He also pledged that his plan to expand insurance coverage would be deficit neutral over the next decade, and outlined some of the $948 billion in savings he has proposed to finance his health care reform - including the $313 billion announced this weekend.
generic viagra online
Medarex To Receive Milestone Payment For The Approval Of Ilaris For The Treatment Of Cryopyrin-Associated Periodic Syndrome
Medarex, Inc. (NASDAQ:MEDX) announced it will receive a milestone payment of an undisclosed amount from Novartis Pharma AG (Novartis), in connection with the marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), to market Ilaris® (canakinumab, previously known as ACZ885) for the treatment of children as young as four years old and adults with cryopyrin-associated periodic syndrome, or CAPS, a serious life-long auto-inflammatory disease caused by rare genetic mutations.
News of the day
UCB Brings Neupro(R) Back To All Patients In Europe
UCB announced that Neupro® (rotigotine transdermal patch) can now be prescribed to all patients with idiopathic Parkinson"s disease in Europe and is newly available for the symptomatic treatment of moderate to severe idiopathic Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS) in adults. This follows the decision of the European Commission to lift treatment restrictions on Neupro® in line with the recommendation of the European Medicines Agency (EMEA), issued on 29 May 2009.
Health Insurance

Junior Doctors Feel "press Ganged" Into Occupational HIV Tests

Junior doctors working for the NHS in England feel "press ganged" into having HIV tests, reveals a small study published in the Journal of Medical Ethics. The findings are based on in depth interviews with 24 junior doctors, working, between them, for four NHS hospital trusts. All the doctors had been offered an HIV test as part of their pre-employment occupational health checks. In 2007 the Department of Health issued new guidance relating to health screens for doctors working in the UK. This stipulated that all staff should be offered tests for the serious blood-borne viruses hepatitis B and C, HIV and TB to protect patients from infection. But the guidance makes it clear that the tests are not mandatory for doctors whose work does not expose them to these viruses, nor are they a prerequisite for employment. The doctors interviewed during the course of this study said they were unaware that they might need an HIV test until they received the letter from their prospective employer. They said that they were not given any information about the HIV test or told why they needed to have it - prerequisites of giving informed consent to a procedure - either in this letter or when they actually had a blood sample taken. One doctor said: "The only discussion I had with somebody about the test was to say: "we"re going to test you for HIV. Is that OK?" and then being stabbed." Another said: "I wonder if they"d have sacked me if it was positive. No one really explained what would happen if it were positive either. Would my bosses have been told about it?" Only three of the doctors were actually asked about behaviour that would have increased their risk of acquiring HIV; none felt they had been at high risk. Few were offered any follow up counselling or discussion, which would have been provided had they been ordinary patients. Most of the doctors did not feel they had the option to refuse the test; only four did so. Only two patients in the world have been infected by a doctor. Neither was in the UK. The risk of transmission from healthcare workers to patients is in the order of 1 to 42,000; the risk of transmission from a patient to a doctor is 1 in 300. But the authors point out that in addition to the manner in which it is carried out, the HIV testing policy offers false reassurance to patients. It only applies to new employees or those taking up a new post, meaning that senior doctors who may have been performing high risk (for HIV acquisition) procedures would not be tested. "The new policy provides false reassurances to the general population that doctors performing exposure prone procedures are free from HIV," they say. Journal Of Medical Ethics


Add your comment:
Name:
Site address: http://
Your message:
Enter today\\\\'s date, 2 digits
(spam protection):